BOARD MEETING DATE: February 5, 2010
|
|
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background The FY 2009-2010 Budget for Legal included $325,000 for litigation expenses in environmental law cases and specialized legal counsel. Two law firms, Woodruff Spradlin & Smart and Shute Mihaly & Weinberger, have been assisting District Counsel with environmental litigation matters. The monies for environmental litigation matters have been and will be expended on lawsuits involving the Architectural Coatings Rules, the recently adopted rule for consumer paint thinners Rule 1143, the lawsuit seeking to overturn Rule 433 Natural Gas Quality, as well as other matters requiring specialized legal counsel. Although District Counsel has put cost-containment measures in place, it is expected that expenses in these matters, and the other matters handled by specialized legal counsel will require an additional amount up to $375,000 before additional authorized funding is available in July 2010. Accordingly, District Counsel is requesting the appropriation of additional funds in the amount of $375,000, for a total expected expenditure of $700,000 this fiscal year. Proposal In order to defend on-going and threatened litigation, it is necessary to appropriate additional funds for expenditure by outside counsel. It is expected that on-going lawsuits, and new litigation that is possible, as well as matters requiring specialized legal counsel will require an additional $375,000 to be appropriated to Woodruff Spradlin & Smart, Shute Mihaly & Weinberger, and other pre-qualified counsel approved by the Board, as well as specialized legal counsel, as the need arises. Resource Impacts Sufficient funds will be available in Legal's FY 2009-10 Budget following the transfer of funds from the Designation for Litigation and Enforcement. |