BOARD MEETING DATE: February 6, 2009
|
|
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background This Board letter serves as the staff report for proposed amendments to Rule 2701 – SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange. This rule was adopted by the Governing Board at the December Governing Board meeting. Concerns were expressed regarding potential environmental justice issues related to implementation of the Manure Management Project Protocol, which was not included in the rule at that time. This proposal would add the protocol to the rule and include local requirements for projects that seek emission reductions for this protocol under Rule 2701. The objectives of the SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange are to provide high quality certified greenhouse gas emission reductions that enhance the local economy and capture needed co-benefits for Southern California as businesses achieve voluntary reductions. The SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange can assist in providing a mechanism to recognize and quantify voluntary early reductions. A local program overseen by AQMD can ensure that reductions are real, additional (surplus), quantifiable, verifiable, permanent over a specific time, and enforceable. This will be valuable to facilities that need reductions for CEQA or other environmental mitigation. Proposed Amendments The SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange is a voluntary program where facilities in the South Coast Air District could undertake projects to voluntarily reduce greenhouse gas emissions in advance of, or in the absence of, any regulatory requirement. The Manure Management Project Protocol (also known as the Livestock Project Reporting Protocol) provides guidance to account for and report GHG reductions from the installation of a manure biogas control system for livestock operations. The protocol quantifies methane emission reductions. The effects of other carbon dioxide emissions, such as support equipment, are also considered. Under this protocol, captured methane used to produce electricity for the grid is considered a complementary and separate GHG reduction. To address potential environmental justice concerns, staff is proposing that if a project is located in an environmental justice area (as characterized below), any stationary source equipment emitting any air contaminant would be located greater than a quarter mile (1,320ft, 400m) from any sensitive receptors. A sensitive receptor means any residence including private homes, condominiums, apartments, and living quarters; education resources such as preschools and kindergarten through grade twelve (k-12) schools; daycare centers; and health care facilities such as hospitals or retirement and nursing homes. A sensitive receptor also includes long-term care hospitals, hospices, prisons, and dormitories or similar live-in housing. This distance is recommended in land use guidance criteria for new school sites as a conservative distance to protect health of students from agricultural and stationary source emissions. The land use guidance criteria recommended this distance from the review of documents addressing appropriate minimum distances between sensitive receptors and sources. Environmental justice areas for the District have two components – poverty level and air quality. An environmental justice area has 10 percent or more of the population below the federal poverty level and the top 15 percent particulate exposures or more than 1,000 in a million cancer risk. Data from the Multiple Air Toxic Exposure Study (MATES III) is being used to update the map for the District, and this will be used for the local requirements for the manure management protocol. The rule also clarifies for all projects, that projects must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. Public Process Staff will host a meeting with community and environmental representatives on January 28th, including groups that testified at the December public hearing, to discuss their concerns and the proposed amendments. The meeting is being held in the Inland Empire, which is where projects under this protocol would most likely be located. Key Issues Staff believes that the additional proposed amendments will address the potential environmental justice concerns related to this specific protocol. There are some groups that remain fundamentally opposed to any emission trading or offsets for climate change. CEQA The proposed project has no potential to adversely impact air quality or any other environmental area. Proposed Amended Rule 2701 is administrative in nature and adds local restrictions for projects under the manure management protocol that wish to have District staff certify the emission reductions. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the county clerks of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties immediately following the adoption of the proposed project. Socioeconomic Analysis Participation in Rule 2701 is voluntary, and there are no negative socioeconomic impacts expected from the amendments. Since this rule does not significantly affect air quality or emissions limitations, the law does not require a socioeconomic assessment. AQMP and Legal Mandates There are no AQMP or legal mandates that require amendment of this rule. Draft Findings Health and Safety Code Section 40727 requires the SCAQMD to adopt written findings of necessity, authority, clarity, consistency, non-duplication and reference. Necessity Authority Clarity Consistency Non-Duplication Reference Alternative Control Measures Health and Safety Code Section 40440.5, subsection (c)(3) requires an analysis of alternative control measures. The analysis of alternative control measures is not applicable to Proposed Amended Rule 2701 because the rule does not significantly affect air quality or emissions limitations. Comparative Analysis Health and Safety Code §§40727.2 requires a written analysis comparing a proposed rule or amendment with existing federal, State and District regulations. Health and Safety Code §§40727.2, subsection (c) and (d) further require the analysis to review averaging provisions, operating parameters, work practice requirements, and monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping requirements associated with existing applicable rules and proposed regulations. This requirement is not applicable to Proposed Amended Rule 2701 because the rule does not impose a new emissions limit, make an existing limit more stringent, or impose new or more stringent monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting requirements. Resource Impacts Existing resources should be sufficient to implement this rule. Attachments (EXE, 486k)
|